Xeon w9-3575X vs W-2145

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-2145
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 140 Watt
11.79
Xeon w9-3575X
2024
44 cores / 88 threads, 340 Watt
52.87
+348%

w9-3575X outperforms W-2145 by a whopping 348% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-2145 and Xeon w9-3575X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking66030
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.8939.84
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date29 August 2017 (7 years ago)24 August 2024 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,113$3,789

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon w9-3575X has 303% better value for money than Xeon W-2145.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-2145 and Xeon w9-3575X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)44
Threads1688
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier37no data
L1 cache512 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache11 MB97.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size484 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °C79 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-2145 and Xeon w9-3575X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSocket R4FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt340 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-2145 and Xeon w9-3575X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-+
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon W-2145 and Xeon w9-3575X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGX--
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-2145 and Xeon w9-3575X are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-2145 and Xeon w9-3575X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size512 GB4 TB
Max memory channels48
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-2145 and Xeon w9-3575X.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes48112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-2145 11.79
Xeon w9-3575X 52.87
+348%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-2145 18178
Xeon w9-3575X 81519
+348%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.79 52.87
Recency 29 August 2017 24 August 2024
Physical cores 8 44
Threads 16 88
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 340 Watt

Xeon W-2145 has 142.9% lower power consumption.

Xeon w9-3575X, on the other hand, has a 348.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and 450% more physical cores and 450% more threads.

The Xeon w9-3575X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-2145 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-2145 and Xeon w9-3575X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-2145
Xeon W-2145
Intel Xeon w9-3575X
Xeon w9-3575X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 28 votes

Rate Xeon W-2145 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon w9-3575X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-2145 or Xeon w9-3575X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.