Xeon E-2436 vs W-2145

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-2145
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 140 Watt
11.45
Xeon E-2436
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
14.16
+23.7%

Xeon E-2436 outperforms Xeon W-2145 by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-2145 and Xeon E-2436 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking679512
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.5998.37
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Power efficiency7.7420.62
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date29 August 2017 (7 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,113$331

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E-2436 has 1196% better value for money than Xeon W-2145.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-2145 and Xeon E-2436 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s16 GT/s
Multiplier37no data
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache11 MB (shared)18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size484 mm2163 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-2145 and Xeon E-2436 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSocket R4FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-2145 and Xeon E-2436. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--

Security technologies

Xeon W-2145 and Xeon E-2436 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-2145 and Xeon E-2436 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-2145 and Xeon E-2436. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size512 GB128 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-2145 and Xeon E-2436.

PCIe version3.05
PCI Express lanes4816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-2145 11.45
Xeon E-2436 14.16
+23.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-2145 18180
Xeon E-2436 22487
+23.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.45 14.16
Recency 29 August 2017 14 December 2023
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 16 12
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon W-2145 has 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.

Xeon E-2436, on the other hand, has a 23.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and 115.4% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E-2436 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-2145 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-2145 and Xeon E-2436, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-2145
Xeon W-2145
Intel Xeon E-2436
Xeon E-2436

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 34 votes

Rate Xeon W-2145 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon E-2436 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-2145 or Xeon E-2436, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.