EPYC 9745 vs Xeon W-2140B
Primary details
Comparing Xeon W-2140B and EPYC 9745 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 719 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | Intel Xeon W | no data |
| Power efficiency | 8.60 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Turin (2024) |
| Release date | 21 December 2017 (7 years ago) | 10 October 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $12,141 |
Detailed specifications
Xeon W-2140B and EPYC 9745 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 128 |
| Threads | 16 | 256 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 32 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 11 MB (shared) | 256 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 3 nm |
| Die size | 484 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 70 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon W-2140B and EPYC 9745 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 2 |
| Socket | 2066 | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 400 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-2140B and EPYC 9745. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon W-2140B and EPYC 9745 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-2140B and EPYC 9745 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-2140B and EPYC 9745. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 512 GB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 85.33 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-2140B and EPYC 9745.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 48 | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 21 December 2017 | 10 October 2024 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 128 |
| Threads | 16 | 256 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 400 Watt |
Xeon W-2140B has 233.3% lower power consumption.
EPYC 9745, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Xeon W-2140B and EPYC 9745. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-2140B and EPYC 9745, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
