EPYC 7713 vs Xeon W-2135

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-2135
2017
6 cores / 12 threads, 140 Watt
9.44
EPYC 7713
2021
64 cores / 128 threads, 225 Watt
54.12
+473%

EPYC 7713 outperforms Xeon W-2135 by a whopping 473% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-2135 and EPYC 7713 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking83128
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.194.00
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon WAMD EPYC
Power efficiency6.1521.93
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date29 August 2017 (7 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$835$7,060

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-2135 has 80% better value for money than EPYC 7713.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-2135 and EPYC 7713 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads12128
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz3.68 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3720
L1 cache384 KB4 MB
L2 cache6 MB32 MB
L3 cache8.25 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm+
Die size484 mm28x 81 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)64 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-2135 and EPYC 7713 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA2066SP3
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-2135 and EPYC 7713. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon W-2135 and EPYC 7713 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-2135 and EPYC 7713 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-2135 and EPYC 7713. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size512 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-2135 and EPYC 7713.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes48128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-2135 9.44
EPYC 7713 54.12
+473%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-2135 14441
EPYC 7713 82825
+474%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon W-2135 1416
EPYC 7713 1579
+11.5%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon W-2135 6647
EPYC 7713 15297
+130%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.44 54.12
Recency 29 August 2017 12 January 2021
Physical cores 6 64
Threads 12 128
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 225 Watt

Xeon W-2135 has 60.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7713, on the other hand, has a 473.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 966.7% more physical cores and 966.7% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7713 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-2135 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-2135 and EPYC 7713, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-2135
Xeon W-2135
AMD EPYC 7713
EPYC 7713

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 147 votes

Rate Xeon W-2135 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 115 votes

Rate EPYC 7713 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-2135 or EPYC 7713, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.