Xeon Silver 4116T vs W-2133

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-2133
2017
6 cores / 12 threads, 140 Watt
7.97
Xeon Silver 4116T
2017
12 cores / 24 threads, 85 Watt
9.56
+19.9%

Xeon Silver 4116T outperforms Xeon W-2133 by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-2133 and Xeon Silver 4116T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking943800
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.36no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon WIntel Xeon Silver
Power efficiency5.3610.59
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
Release date29 August 2017 (7 years ago)11 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$617no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-2133 and Xeon Silver 4116T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads1224
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3621
L1 cache64K (per core)768 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)12 MB
L3 cache8.25 MB (shared)16.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size484 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data91 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-2133 and Xeon Silver 4116T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2066FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt85 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-2133 and Xeon Silver 4116T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--

Security technologies

Xeon W-2133 and Xeon Silver 4116T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-2133 and Xeon Silver 4116T are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-2133 and Xeon Silver 4116T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size512 GB768 GB
Max memory channels46
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/s115.212 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-2133 and Xeon Silver 4116T.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4848

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-2133 7.97
Xeon Silver 4116T 9.56
+19.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-2133 12658
Xeon Silver 4116T 15187
+20%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.97 9.56
Recency 29 August 2017 11 July 2017
Physical cores 6 12
Threads 12 24
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 85 Watt

Xeon W-2133 has an age advantage of 1 month.

Xeon Silver 4116T, on the other hand, has a 19.9% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 64.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Silver 4116T is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-2133 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-2133 and Xeon Silver 4116T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-2133
Xeon W-2133
Intel Xeon Silver 4116T
Xeon Silver 4116T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 34 votes

Rate Xeon W-2133 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Silver 4116T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-2133 or Xeon Silver 4116T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.