Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 vs Xeon W-2125

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-2125
2017
4 cores / 8 threads, 120 Watt
6.33
Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
2017
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
7.08
+11.8%

Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 outperforms Xeon W-2125 by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-2125 and Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10661002
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.04no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon WAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency4.9910.31
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date29 August 2017 (7 years ago)29 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$444no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-2125 and Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads812
Base clock speed4 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier4032
L1 cache64K (per core)576 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)3 MB
L3 cache8.25 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size484 mm2213 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)64 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-2125 and Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2066AM4
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-2125 and Ryzen 5 PRO 1600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon W-2125 and Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-2125 and Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-2125 and Ryzen 5 PRO 1600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size512 GB64 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/s42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-2125 and Ryzen 5 PRO 1600.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-2125 6.33
Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 7.08
+11.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-2125 10054
Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 11240
+11.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.33 7.08
Recency 29 August 2017 29 June 2017
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 8 12
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon W-2125 has an age advantage of 2 months.

Ryzen 5 PRO 1600, on the other hand, has a 11.8% higher aggregate performance score, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and 84.6% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-2125 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-2125 and Ryzen 5 PRO 1600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-2125
Xeon W-2125
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
Ryzen 5 PRO 1600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 28 votes

Rate Xeon W-2125 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 47 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-2125 or Ryzen 5 PRO 1600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.