Xeon W3520 vs W-2104

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-2104
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 120 Watt
3.46
+88%
Xeon W3520
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
1.84

Xeon W-2104 outperforms Xeon W3520 by an impressive 88% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-2104 and Xeon W3520 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15391991
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.280.26
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Power efficiency2.731.34
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Bloomfield (2008−2010)
Release date29 August 2017 (7 years ago)30 March 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$255$404

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-2104 has 1931% better value for money than Xeon W3520.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-2104 and Xeon W3520 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.66 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2.93 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier32no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache8.25 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size484 mm2263 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data68 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)66 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data731 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-2104 and Xeon W3520 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2066FCLGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-2104 and Xeon W3520. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-1.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching++
PAE46 Bit36 Bit
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon W-2104 and Xeon W3520 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-2104 and Xeon W3520 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-2104 and Xeon W3520. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR3
Maximum memory size512 GB24 GB
Max memory channels43
Maximum memory bandwidth76.805 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-2104 and Xeon W3520.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-2104 3.46
+88%
Xeon W3520 1.84

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-2104 5495
+87.9%
Xeon W3520 2924

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.46 1.84
Recency 29 August 2017 30 March 2009
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 130 Watt

Xeon W-2104 has a 88% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 8.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon W3520, on the other hand, has 100% more threads.

The Xeon W-2104 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W3520 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-2104 and Xeon W3520, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-2104
Xeon W-2104
Intel Xeon W3520
Xeon W3520

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon W-2104 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 120 votes

Rate Xeon W3520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-2104 or Xeon W3520, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.