Xeon W-3275 vs W-2104

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-2104
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 120 Watt
3.47
Xeon W-3275
2019
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
25.86
+645%

Xeon W-3275 outperforms Xeon W-2104 by a whopping 645% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-2104 and Xeon W-3275 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1538189
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.3511.37
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon WIntel Xeon W
Power efficiency2.7311.89
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date29 August 2017 (7 years ago)3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$255$4,449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-3275 has 113% better value for money than Xeon W-2104.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-2104 and Xeon W-3275 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads456
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0DMI 3.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier3225
L1 cache256 KB1.75 MB
L2 cache4 MB28 MB
L3 cache8.25 MB (shared)38.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size484 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data76 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)66 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-2104 and Xeon W-3275 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2066FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-2104 and Xeon W-3275. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon W-2104 and Xeon W-3275 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-2104 and Xeon W-3275 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-2104 and Xeon W-3275. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size512 GB1 TB
Max memory channels46
Maximum memory bandwidth76.805 GB/s140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-2104 and Xeon W-3275.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-2104 3.47
Xeon W-3275 25.86
+645%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-2104 5495
Xeon W-3275 40931
+645%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.47 25.86
Recency 29 August 2017 3 June 2019
Physical cores 4 28
Threads 4 56
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 205 Watt

Xeon W-2104 has 70.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3275, on the other hand, has a 645.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 600% more physical cores and 1300% more threads.

The Xeon W-3275 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-2104 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-2104 and Xeon W-3275, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-2104
Xeon W-2104
Intel Xeon W-3275
Xeon W-3275

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon W-2104 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 6 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-2104 or Xeon W-3275, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.