EPYC 7773X vs Xeon W-2102

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-2102
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 120 Watt
3.19
EPYC 7773X
2022
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
57.60
+1706%

EPYC 7773X outperforms Xeon W-2102 by a whopping 1706% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-2102 and EPYC 7773X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking160122
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.96no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Power efficiency2.5219.47
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Milan-X (2022)
Release date29 August 2017 (7 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$202no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-2102 and EPYC 7773X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads4128
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier29no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache8.25 MB (shared)768 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die size484 mm28x 81 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)66 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-2102 and EPYC 7773X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA2066SP3
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-2102 and EPYC 7773X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon W-2102 and EPYC 7773X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-2102 and EPYC 7773X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-2102 and EPYC 7773X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size512 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.805 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-2102 and EPYC 7773X.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes48128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-2102 3.19
EPYC 7773X 57.60
+1706%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-2102 5073
EPYC 7773X 91491
+1703%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.19 57.60
Recency 29 August 2017 22 March 2022
Physical cores 4 64
Threads 4 128
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 280 Watt

Xeon W-2102 has 133.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7773X, on the other hand, has a 1705.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7773X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-2102 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-2102 and EPYC 7773X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-2102
Xeon W-2102
AMD EPYC 7773X
EPYC 7773X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 5 votes

Rate Xeon W-2102 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 23 votes

Rate EPYC 7773X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-2102 or EPYC 7773X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.