Celeron N6211 vs Xeon W-1350

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-1350
2021
6 cores / 12 threads, 80 Watt
12.01
+746%
Celeron N6211
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.42

Xeon W-1350 outperforms Celeron N6211 by a whopping 746% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-1350 and Celeron N6211 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6392197
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation94.793.33
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataElkhart Lake
Power efficiency14.1520.59
Architecture codenameRocket Lake-S (2021)Elkhart Lake (2022)
Release date6 May 2021 (3 years ago)17 July 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$255$54

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-1350 has 2747% better value for money than Celeron N6211.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-1350 and Celeron N6211 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed3.3 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache80 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1.5 MB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size276 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C70 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-1350 and Celeron N6211 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1200BGA1493
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt6.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-1350 and Celeron N6211. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-1350 and Celeron N6211 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-1350 and Celeron N6211 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-1350 and Celeron N6211. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth50 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics P750Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.3 GHzno data
Execution Units32no data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon W-1350 and Celeron N6211 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon W-1350 and Celeron N6211 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200 @60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort5120 x 3200 @60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon W-1350 and Celeron N6211 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.1no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-1350 and Celeron N6211.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-1350 12.01
+746%
Celeron N6211 1.42

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-1350 19007
+747%
Celeron N6211 2245

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.01 1.42
Integrated graphics card 4.56 1.39
Recency 6 May 2021 17 July 2022
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 6 Watt

Xeon W-1350 has a 745.8% higher aggregate performance score, 228.1% faster integrated GPU, and 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

Celeron N6211, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 1233.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W-1350 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N6211 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-1350 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron N6211 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-1350 and Celeron N6211, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-1350
Xeon W-1350
Intel Celeron N6211
Celeron N6211

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 22 votes

Rate Xeon W-1350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 4 votes

Rate Celeron N6211 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-1350 or Celeron N6211, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.