Xeon E5-2678 v3 vs W-10885M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-10885M
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
9.95
+6.9%
Xeon E5-2678 v3
2015
12 cores / 24 threads, 120 Watt
9.31

Xeon W-10885M outperforms Xeon E5-2678 v3 by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-10885M and Xeon E5-2678 v3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking775820
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentMobile workstationServer
SeriesComet LakeXeon
Power efficiency20.847.30
Architecture codenameComet Lake-H (2020)Haswell (2013−2015)
Release date13 May 2020 (4 years ago)2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-10885M and Xeon E5-2678 v3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads1624
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache512 KB384 KB
L2 cache2 MB3072 KB
L3 cache16 MB30 MB
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data356 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data84 °C
Number of transistorsno data5,560 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-10885M and Xeon E5-2678 v3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA1440LGA2011-3
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-10885M and Xeon E5-2678 v3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data

Security technologies

Xeon W-10885M and Xeon E5-2678 v3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-10885M and Xeon E5-2678 v3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-10885M and Xeon E5-2678 v3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth45.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel® Processorsno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.25 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon W-10885M and Xeon E5-2678 v3 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon W-10885M and Xeon E5-2678 v3 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@30Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon W-10885M and Xeon E5-2678 v3 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-10885M and Xeon E5-2678 v3.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1640

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-10885M 9.95
+6.9%
Xeon E5-2678 v3 9.31

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-10885M 15746
+6.9%
Xeon E5-2678 v3 14735

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon W-10885M 1650
+62.4%
Xeon E5-2678 v3 1016

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon W-10885M 7201
+6.3%
Xeon E5-2678 v3 6774

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.95 9.31
Physical cores 8 12
Threads 16 24
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 120 Watt

Xeon W-10885M has a 6.9% higher aggregate performance score, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 166.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon E5-2678 v3, on the other hand, has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon W-10885M and Xeon E5-2678 v3.

Be aware that Xeon W-10885M is a mobile workstation processor while Xeon E5-2678 v3 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-10885M and Xeon E5-2678 v3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-10885M
Xeon W-10885M
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
Xeon E5-2678 v3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 44 votes

Rate Xeon W-10885M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 2387 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2678 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-10885M or Xeon E5-2678 v3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.