Ultra 7 256V vs Xeon W-10885M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-10885M
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
9.93
Core Ultra 7 256V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
12.57
+26.6%

Core Ultra 7 256V outperforms Xeon W-10885M by a significant 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-10885M and Core Ultra 7 256V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking780618
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
SeriesComet Lakeno data
Power efficiency20.8769.93
Architecture codenameComet Lake-H (2020)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date13 May 2020 (4 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-10885M and Core Ultra 7 256V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/s37 MHz
L1 cache512 KB192 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-10885M and Core Ultra 7 256V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1440FCBGA2833
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-10885M and Core Ultra 7 256V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0++
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

Xeon W-10885M and Core Ultra 7 256V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-10885M and Core Ultra 7 256V are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-10885M and Core Ultra 7 256V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth45.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel ProcessorsIntel Arc Graphics 140V
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency1.25 GHz1.95 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon W-10885M and Core Ultra 7 256V integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon W-10885M and Core Ultra 7 256V integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@30Hz4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hz3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon W-10885M and Core Ultra 7 256V integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212.2
OpenGL4.54.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-10885M and Core Ultra 7 256V.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes164
PCI supportno data5.0 and 4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-10885M 9.93
Ultra 7 256V 12.57
+26.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-10885M 15776
Ultra 7 256V 19971
+26.6%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Xeon W-10885M 8378
Ultra 7 256V 9460
+12.9%

Blender(-)

Xeon W-10885M 286
Ultra 7 256V 324
+13.3%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Xeon W-10885M 1340
Ultra 7 256V 1972
+47.2%

7-Zip Single

Xeon W-10885M 5507
Ultra 7 256V 5672
+3%

7-Zip

Xeon W-10885M 45696
+27.1%
Ultra 7 256V 35964

WebXPRT 3

Xeon W-10885M 229
Ultra 7 256V 306
+33.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.93 12.57
Integrated graphics card 5.58 13.29
Recency 13 May 2020 24 September 2024
Threads 16 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 17 Watt

Xeon W-10885M has 100% more threads.

Ultra 7 256V, on the other hand, has a 26.6% higher aggregate performance score, 138.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 164.7% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 7 256V is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-10885M in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-10885M is a mobile workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 256V is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-10885M and Core Ultra 7 256V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-10885M
Xeon W-10885M
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
Core Ultra 7 256V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 45 votes

Rate Xeon W-10885M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 4 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 256V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-10885M or Core Ultra 7 256V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.