7 150U vs Xeon W-10885M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-10885M
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
10.29

Core 7 150U outperforms Xeon W-10885M by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-10885M and Core 7 150U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking773762
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
SeriesComet LakeRaptor Lake-U
Power efficiency20.8563.83
Architecture codenameComet Lake-H (2020)Raptor Lake-U Refresh (2024)
Release date13 May 2020 (4 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-10885M and Core 7 150U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed2.4 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz5.4 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/s55 MHz
L1 cache512 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-10885M and Core 7 150U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1440FCBGA1744
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-10885M and Core 7 150U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon W-10885M and Core 7 150U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-10885M and Core 7 150U are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-10885M and Core 7 150U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267
Maximum memory size128 GB96 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth45.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel® ProcessorsIntel® Graphics
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency1.25 GHz1.3 GHz
Execution Unitsno data96

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon W-10885M and Core 7 150U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon W-10885M and Core 7 150U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@30Hz4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hz4096 x 2304 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon W-10885M and Core 7 150U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212.1
OpenGL4.54.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-10885M and Core 7 150U.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes168

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-10885M 10.29
7 150U 10.50
+2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-10885M 15746
7 150U 16072
+2.1%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon W-10885M 1646
7 150U 2247
+36.5%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon W-10885M 7120
7 150U 7686
+7.9%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Xeon W-10885M 1640
+8.9%
7 150U 1506

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Xeon W-10885M 210
7 150U 270
+28.6%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Xeon W-10885M 8378
+1.3%
7 150U 8270

Blender(-)

Xeon W-10885M 286
7 150U 358
+25.2%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Xeon W-10885M 1340
7 150U 1939
+44.7%

7-Zip Single

Xeon W-10885M 5507
7 150U 6003
+9%

7-Zip

Xeon W-10885M 45696
+18.4%
7 150U 38600

WebXPRT 3

Xeon W-10885M 229
7 150U 306
+33.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.29 10.50
Recency 13 May 2020 8 January 2024
Physical cores 8 10
Threads 16 12
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 15 Watt

Xeon W-10885M has 33.3% more threads.

7 150U, on the other hand, has a 2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 25% more physical cores, and 200% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon W-10885M and Core 7 150U.

Be aware that Xeon W-10885M is a mobile workstation processor while Core 7 150U is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-10885M and Core 7 150U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-10885M
Xeon W-10885M
Intel Core 7 150U
Core 7 150U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 44 votes

Rate Xeon W-10885M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 46 votes

Rate Core 7 150U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-10885M or Core 7 150U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.