Ultra 7 265KF vs Xeon Silver 4510T
Aggregate performance score
Core Ultra 7 265KF outperforms Xeon Silver 4510T by an impressive 97% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Silver 4510T and Core Ultra 7 265KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 336 | 98 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 75.21 | 98.08 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 15.38 | 27.85 |
| Architecture codename | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) |
| Release date | 14 December 2023 (1 year ago) | 24 October 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $624 | $379 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Ultra 7 265KF has 30% better value for money than Xeon Silver 4510T.
Detailed specifications
Xeon Silver 4510T and Core Ultra 7 265KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 20 (Icosa-Core) |
| Performance-cores | no data | 8 |
| Efficient-cores | no data | 12 |
| Threads | 24 | 20 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 5.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 112 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 30 MB (shared) | 30 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | Intel 7 nm | 3 nm |
| Die size | no data | 243 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 84 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 17,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Silver 4510T and Core Ultra 7 265KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA4677 | FCLGA1851 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4510T and Core Ultra 7 265KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| SIPP | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | + | + |
| Supported AI Software Frameworks | - | OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN |
Security technologies
Xeon Silver 4510T and Core Ultra 7 265KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| SGX | Yes with Intel® SPS | no data |
| OS Guard | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4510T and Core Ultra 7 265KF are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4510T and Core Ultra 7 265KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 @ 4400 MT/s (1 DPC &2DPC) | DDR5-6400 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TB | 192 GB |
| Max memory channels | 8 | 2 |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4510T and Core Ultra 7 265KF.
| PCIe version | 5 | 5.0 and 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 80 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 18.62 | 36.65 |
| Recency | 14 December 2023 | 24 October 2024 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 20 |
| Threads | 24 | 20 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 125 Watt |
Xeon Silver 4510T has 20% more threads, and 8.7% lower power consumption.
Ultra 7 265KF, on the other hand, has a 96.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, and 66.7% more physical cores.
The Core Ultra 7 265KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4510T in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon Silver 4510T is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 265KF is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
