Xeon Gold 6414U vs Silver 4316

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4316
2021
20 cores / 40 threads, 150 Watt
20.11
Xeon Gold 6414U
2023
32 cores / 64 threads, 250 Watt
36.70
+82.5%

Xeon Gold 6414U outperforms Xeon Silver 4316 by an impressive 82% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4316 and Xeon Gold 6414U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28599
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data44.88
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency12.4513.63
Architecture codenameIce Lake-SP (2021)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date6 April 2021 (3 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,296

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4316 and Xeon Gold 6414U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores20 (Icosa-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads4064
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache30 MB (shared)60 MB
Chip lithography10 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data4x 477 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)84 °C76 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4316 and Xeon Gold 6414U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA4189FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt250 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4316 and Xeon Gold 6414U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4316 and Xeon Gold 6414U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXYes with Intel® SPSYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4316 and Xeon Gold 6414U are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4316 and Xeon Gold 6414U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2667DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400
Maximum memory size6 TB4 TB
Max memory channels88
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4316 and Xeon Gold 6414U.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes6480

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4316 20.11
Xeon Gold 6414U 36.70
+82.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4316 31341
Xeon Gold 6414U 57200
+82.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.11 36.70
Recency 6 April 2021 10 January 2023
Physical cores 20 32
Threads 40 64
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 250 Watt

Xeon Silver 4316 has 66.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6414U, on the other hand, has a 82.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 60% more physical cores and 60% more threads.

The Xeon Gold 6414U is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4316 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4316 and Xeon Gold 6414U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4316
Xeon Silver 4316
Intel Xeon Gold 6414U
Xeon Gold 6414U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 21 vote

Rate Xeon Silver 4316 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6414U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4316 or Xeon Gold 6414U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.