Xeon Gold 5412U vs Silver 4316

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4316
2021
20 cores / 40 threads, 150 Watt
19.73
Xeon Gold 5412U
2023
24 cores / 48 threads, 185 Watt
33.09
+67.7%

Xeon Gold 5412U outperforms Xeon Silver 4316 by an impressive 68% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4316 and Xeon Gold 5412U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking285120
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data92.71
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency12.4516.93
Architecture codenameIce Lake-SP (2021)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date6 April 2021 (3 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,113

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4316 and Xeon Gold 5412U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores20 (Icosa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads4048
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache30 MB (shared)45 MB
Chip lithography10 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)84 °C81 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4316 and Xeon Gold 5412U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA4189FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4316 and Xeon Gold 5412U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4316 and Xeon Gold 5412U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXYes with Intel® SPSYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4316 and Xeon Gold 5412U are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4316 and Xeon Gold 5412U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2667DDR5-4400
Maximum memory size6 TB4 TB
Max memory channels88
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4316 and Xeon Gold 5412U.

PCIe version4.05
PCI Express lanes6480

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4316 19.73
Xeon Gold 5412U 33.09
+67.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4316 31341
Xeon Gold 5412U 52557
+67.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.73 33.09
Recency 6 April 2021 10 January 2023
Physical cores 20 24
Threads 40 48
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 185 Watt

Xeon Silver 4316 has 23.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 5412U, on the other hand, has a 67.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 20% more physical cores and 20% more threads.

The Xeon Gold 5412U is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4316 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4316 and Xeon Gold 5412U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4316
Xeon Silver 4316
Intel Xeon Gold 5412U
Xeon Gold 5412U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 21 vote

Rate Xeon Silver 4316 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 8 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5412U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4316 or Xeon Gold 5412U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.