Xeon E-2314 vs Silver 4316

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4316
2021
20 cores / 40 threads, 150 Watt
19.80
+284%
Xeon E-2314
2021
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
5.15

Xeon Silver 4316 outperforms Xeon E-2314 by a whopping 284% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4316 and Xeon E-2314 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2851197
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency12.447.47
Architecture codenameIce Lake-SP (2021)Rocket Lake-E (2021)
Release date6 April 2021 (3 years ago)8 September 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4316 and Xeon E-2314 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores20 (Icosa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads404
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache30 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)84 °C72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4316 and Xeon E-2314 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA4189FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4316 and Xeon E-2314. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4316 and Xeon E-2314 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
SGXYes with Intel® SPSYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4316 and Xeon E-2314 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4316 and Xeon E-2314. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2667DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size6 TB128 GB
Max memory channels82
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4316 and Xeon E-2314.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes6444

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4316 19.80
+284%
Xeon E-2314 5.15

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4316 31341
+285%
Xeon E-2314 8146

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.80 5.15
Recency 6 April 2021 8 September 2021
Physical cores 20 4
Threads 40 4
Chip lithography 10 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon Silver 4316 has a 284.5% higher aggregate performance score, 400% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E-2314, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, and 130.8% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Silver 4316 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E-2314 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4316 and Xeon E-2314, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4316
Xeon Silver 4316
Intel Xeon E-2314
Xeon E-2314

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 21 vote

Rate Xeon Silver 4316 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 7 votes

Rate Xeon E-2314 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4316 or Xeon E-2314, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.