Xeon D-1747NTE vs Silver 4309Y

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4309Y
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 105 Watt
12.11
Xeon D-1747NTE
2022
10 cores / 20 threads, 80 Watt
12.77
+5.5%

Xeon D-1747NTE outperforms Xeon Silver 4309Y by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4309Y and Xeon D-1747NTE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking633596
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency10.9115.11
Architecture codenameIce Lake-SP (2021)no data
Release date6 April 2021 (3 years ago)1 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4309Y and Xeon D-1747NTE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads1620
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache12 MB (shared)15 MB
Chip lithography10 nm10 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)76 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4309Y and Xeon D-1747NTE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA4189FCBGA2227
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4309Y and Xeon D-1747NTE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data+
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Thermal Monitoring-+
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4309Y and Xeon D-1747NTE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXYes with Intel® SPSYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4309Y and Xeon D-1747NTE are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4309Y and Xeon D-1747NTE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2667DDR4
Maximum memory size6 TB384 GB
Max memory channels83
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4309Y and Xeon D-1747NTE.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes6416
USB revisionno data3.0
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data24
Number of USB portsno data4
Integrated LANno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4309Y 12.11
Xeon D-1747NTE 12.77
+5.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4309Y 19237
Xeon D-1747NTE 20279
+5.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.11 12.77
Recency 6 April 2021 1 January 2022
Physical cores 8 10
Threads 16 20
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 80 Watt

Xeon D-1747NTE has a 5.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, 25% more physical cores and 25% more threads, and 31.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon Silver 4309Y and Xeon D-1747NTE.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4309Y and Xeon D-1747NTE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4309Y
Xeon Silver 4309Y
Intel Xeon D-1747NTE
Xeon D-1747NTE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 11 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4309Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-1747NTE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4309Y or Xeon D-1747NTE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.