Xeon w9-3595X vs Silver 4216

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4216
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 100 Watt
13.47
Xeon w9-3595X
2024
60 cores / 120 threads, 385 Watt
64.93
+382%

Xeon w9-3595X outperforms Xeon Silver 4216 by a whopping 382% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4216 and Xeon w9-3595X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking57412
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.7120.07
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Silverno data
Power efficiency12.2815.38
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,002$5,889

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon w9-3595X has 13% better value for money than Xeon Silver 4216.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4216 and Xeon w9-3595X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)60 (Hexaconta-Core)
Threads32120
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.8 GHz
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache1 MB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache16 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache22 MB112.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data4x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature79 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4216 and Xeon w9-3595X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt385 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4216 and Xeon w9-3595X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-+
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4216 and Xeon w9-3595X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4216 and Xeon w9-3595X are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4216 and Xeon w9-3595X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size1 TB4 TB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4216 and Xeon w9-3595X.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes48112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4216 13.47
Xeon w9-3595X 64.93
+382%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4216 20613
Xeon w9-3595X 99375
+382%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.47 64.93
Recency 2 April 2019 24 August 2024
Physical cores 16 60
Threads 32 120
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 385 Watt

Xeon Silver 4216 has 285% lower power consumption.

Xeon w9-3595X, on the other hand, has a 382% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and 275% more physical cores and 275% more threads.

The Xeon w9-3595X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4216 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4216 and Xeon w9-3595X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4216
Xeon Silver 4216
Intel Xeon w9-3595X
Xeon w9-3595X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 19 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4216 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 35 votes

Rate Xeon w9-3595X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4216 or Xeon w9-3595X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.