Xeon Platinum 8368 vs Silver 4214

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4214
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 85 Watt
10.19
Xeon Platinum 8368
2021
38 cores / 76 threads, 270 Watt
57.95
+469%

Xeon Platinum 8368 outperforms Xeon Silver 4214 by a whopping 469% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4214 and Xeon Platinum 8368 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking75720
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation18.01no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Silverno data
Power efficiency11.3520.31
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$694no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4214 and Xeon Platinum 8368 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)38
Threads2476
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache768 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache12 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache16.5 MB57 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature77 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data83 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4214 and Xeon Platinum 8368 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4214 and Xeon Platinum 8368. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4214 and Xeon Platinum 8368 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4214 and Xeon Platinum 8368 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4214 and Xeon Platinum 8368. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size1 TB6 TB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4214 and Xeon Platinum 8368.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4214 10.19
Xeon Platinum 8368 57.95
+469%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4214 16190
Xeon Platinum 8368 92054
+469%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.19 57.95
Recency 2 April 2019 6 April 2021
Physical cores 12 38
Threads 24 76
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 270 Watt

Xeon Silver 4214 has 217.6% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8368, on the other hand, has a 468.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 216.7% more physical cores and 216.7% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Platinum 8368 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4214 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4214 and Xeon Platinum 8368, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4214
Xeon Silver 4214
Intel Xeon Platinum 8368
Xeon Platinum 8368

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 22 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4214 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 100 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8368 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4214 or Xeon Platinum 8368, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.