FX-770K vs Xeon Silver 4210R

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4210R
2020
10 cores / 20 threads, 100 Watt
9.70
+395%
FX-770K
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.96

Xeon Silver 4210R outperforms FX-770K by a whopping 395% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4210R and FX-770K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking7951951
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation28.06no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon Silverno data
Power efficiency9.012.80
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date24 February 2020 (4 years ago)December 2014 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$511no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4210R and FX-770K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads204
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache640 KB256K
L2 cache10 MB4 MB
L3 cache13.75 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data245 mm2
Maximum core temperature84 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistorsno data2,411 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4210R and FX-770K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFCLGA3647FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4210R and FX-770K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4210R and FX-770K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4210R and FX-770K are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4210R and FX-770K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR3-2133
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4210R and FX-770K.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4210R 9.70
+395%
FX-770K 1.96

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4210R 15118
+394%
FX-770K 3060

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.70 1.96
Physical cores 10 4
Threads 20 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon Silver 4210R has a 394.9% higher aggregate performance score, 150% more physical cores and 400% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

FX-770K, on the other hand, has 53.8% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Silver 4210R is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-770K in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Silver 4210R is a server/workstation processor while FX-770K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4210R and FX-770K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4210R
Xeon Silver 4210R
AMD FX-770K
FX-770K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 37 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4210R on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 7 votes

Rate FX-770K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4210R or FX-770K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.