EPYC 9354P vs Xeon Silver 4210R

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4210R
2020
10 cores / 20 threads, 100 Watt
9.88
EPYC 9354P
2022
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
50.06
+407%

EPYC 9354P outperforms Xeon Silver 4210R by a whopping 407% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4210R and EPYC 9354P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking79036
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation28.2814.96
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon SilverAMD EPYC
Power efficiency9.0116.30
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date24 February 2020 (4 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$511$2,730

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Silver 4210R has 89% better value for money than EPYC 9354P.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4210R and EPYC 9354P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads2064
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.25 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.25 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier2432.5
L1 cache640 KB2 MB
L2 cache10 MB32 MB
L3 cache13.75 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data8x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature84 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data52,560 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4210R and EPYC 9354P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFCLGA3647SP5
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4210R and EPYC 9354P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4210R and EPYC 9354P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4210R and EPYC 9354P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4210R and EPYC 9354P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size1 TB6 TiB
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4210R and EPYC 9354P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes48128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4210R 9.88
EPYC 9354P 50.06
+407%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4210R 15118
EPYC 9354P 76605
+407%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon Silver 4210R 1084
EPYC 9354P 1403
+29.4%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon Silver 4210R 6117
EPYC 9354P 11992
+96%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.88 50.06
Recency 24 February 2020 10 November 2022
Physical cores 10 32
Threads 20 64
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 280 Watt

Xeon Silver 4210R has 180% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9354P, on the other hand, has a 406.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 220% more physical cores and 220% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9354P is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4210R in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4210R and EPYC 9354P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4210R
Xeon Silver 4210R
AMD EPYC 9354P
EPYC 9354P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 37 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4210R on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate EPYC 9354P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4210R or EPYC 9354P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.