Xeon Gold 5320 vs Silver 4210

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4210
2019
10 cores / 20 threads, 85 Watt
8.55
Xeon Gold 5320
2021
26 cores / 52 threads, 185 Watt
23.64
+176%

Xeon Gold 5320 outperforms Xeon Silver 4210 by a whopping 176% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4210 and Xeon Gold 5320 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking893219
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation19.25no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Silverno data
Power efficiency9.5212.09
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$501no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4210 and Xeon Gold 5320 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)26 (Hexacosa-Core)
Threads2052
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache640 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache10 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache13.75 MB39 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature78 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data79 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4210 and Xeon Gold 5320 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4210 and Xeon Gold 5320. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4210 and Xeon Gold 5320 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4210 and Xeon Gold 5320 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4210 and Xeon Gold 5320. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size1 TB6 TB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4210 and Xeon Gold 5320.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4210 8.55
Xeon Gold 5320 23.64
+176%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4210 13575
Xeon Gold 5320 37558
+177%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.55 23.64
Recency 2 April 2019 6 April 2021
Physical cores 10 26
Threads 20 52
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 185 Watt

Xeon Silver 4210 has 117.6% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 5320, on the other hand, has a 176.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 160% more physical cores and 160% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Gold 5320 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4210 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4210 and Xeon Gold 5320, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4210
Xeon Silver 4210
Intel Xeon Gold 5320
Xeon Gold 5320

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 47 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 8 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4210 or Xeon Gold 5320, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.