EPYC 7313 vs Xeon Silver 4210

Place in performance ranking	863	188
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	51.62	17.34
Market segment	Server	Server
Series	Intel Xeon Silver	AMD EPYC
Architecture codename	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)	Milan (2021−2023)
Release date	2 April 2019 (5 years ago)	12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$501	$1,083

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Silver 4210 has 198% better value for money than EPYC 7313.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4210 and EPYC 7313 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	10 (Deca-Core)	16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads	20	32
Base clock speed	2.2 GHz	3 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.2 GHz	3.7 GHz
Multiplier	22	30
L1 cache	640 KB	1 MB
L2 cache	10 MB	8 MB
L3 cache	13.75 MB	128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm+
Die size	no data	4x 81 mm²
Maximum core temperature	78 °C	no data
Number of transistors	no data	16,600 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	+	+
Unlocked multiplier	-	+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4210 and EPYC 7313 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	2 (Multiprocessor)	2
Socket	FCLGA3647	SP3
Power consumption (TDP)	85 Watt	155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4210 and EPYC 7313. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512	no data
AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	+
vPro	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Speed Shift	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	2.0	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	no data
TSX	+	-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0	-	no data
Status	Launched	no data
Deep Learning Boost	+	-

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4210 and EPYC 7313 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4210 and EPYC 7313 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	no data
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4210 and EPYC 7313. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-2400	DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size	1 TB	4 TiB
Max memory channels	6	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	115.212 GB/s	204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support	+	-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4210 and EPYC 7313.

PCIe version	3.0	4.0
PCI Express lanes	48	128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4210 8.70

EPYC 7313 25.27
+190%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4210 13457

EPYC 7313 39091
+190%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon Silver 4210 990

EPYC 7313 1487
+50.2%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon Silver 4210 5580

EPYC 7313 11432
+105%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	8.70	25.27
Recency	2 April 2019	12 January 2021
Physical cores	10	16
Threads	20	32
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	85 Watt	155 Watt

Xeon Silver 4210 has 82.4% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7313, on the other hand, has a 190.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 60% more physical cores and 60% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7313 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4210 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4210 and EPYC 7313, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.