Ryzen Threadripper 1930X vs Xeon Silver 4208
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Silver 4208 and Ryzen Threadripper 1930X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 991 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 18.62 | no data |
Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
Series | Intel Xeon Silver | no data |
Power efficiency | 7.89 | no data |
Architecture codename | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | Zen (2017−2020) |
Release date | 2 April 2019 (5 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $417 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon Silver 4208 and Ryzen Threadripper 1930X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
Threads | 16 | no data |
Base clock speed | 2.1 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
Multiplier | 21 | no data |
L1 cache | 512 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 8 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 11 MB | 32768 KB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 78 °C | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Silver 4208 and Ryzen Threadripper 1930X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | FCLGA3647 | SP3r2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4208 and Ryzen Threadripper 1930X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
AES-NI | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
vPro | + | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Speed Shift | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
TSX | + | - |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon Silver 4208 and Ryzen Threadripper 1930X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4208 and Ryzen Threadripper 1930X are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4208 and Ryzen Threadripper 1930X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-2400 | DDR4 |
Maximum memory size | 1 TB | no data |
Max memory channels | 6 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 115.212 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4208 and Ryzen Threadripper 1930X.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 48 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 8 | 12 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 125 Watt |
Xeon Silver 4208 has 47.1% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Threadripper 1930X, on the other hand, has 50% more physical cores.
We couldn't decide between Xeon Silver 4208 and Ryzen Threadripper 1930X. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon Silver 4208 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Threadripper 1930X is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4208 and Ryzen Threadripper 1930X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.