Celeron M 410 vs Xeon Silver 4208

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4208 and Celeron M 410 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking991not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation18.54no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon SilverCeleron M
Power efficiency7.88no data
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Yonah (2005−2006)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$417no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4208 and Celeron M 410 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads161
Base clock speed2.1 GHz1.46 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz1.46 GHz
Bus rateno data533 MHz
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache512 KBno data
L2 cache8 MBno data
L3 cache11 MB1 MB L2 KB
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperature78 °C100 °C
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+-
VID voltage rangeno data1.0V-1.3V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4208 and Celeron M 410 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt27 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4208 and Celeron M 410. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
FSB parityno data-
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4208 and Celeron M 410 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4208 and Celeron M 410 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4208 and Celeron M 410. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400no data
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4208 and Celeron M 410.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4208 11247
+9044%
Celeron M 410 123

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 8 1
Threads 16 1
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 27 Watt

Xeon Silver 4208 has 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M 410, on the other hand, has 214.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon Silver 4208 and Celeron M 410. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon Silver 4208 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron M 410 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4208 and Celeron M 410, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4208
Xeon Silver 4208
Intel Celeron M 410
Celeron M 410

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 38 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4208 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron M 410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4208 or Celeron M 410, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.