Atom C3958 vs Xeon Silver 4208

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4208
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 85 Watt
7.31
+164%

Xeon Silver 4208 outperforms Atom C3958 by a whopping 164% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4208 and Atom C3958 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking9371633
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation24.950.54
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon SilverIntel Atom
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)15 August 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$417$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Silver 4208 has 4520% better value for money than Atom C3958.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4208 and Atom C3958 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1616
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache512 KB896 KB
L2 cache8 MB16 MB
L3 cache11 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature78 °C83 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4208 and Atom C3958 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketSocket Pno data
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt31 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4208 and Atom C3958. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX+no data

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4208 and Atom C3958 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4208 and Atom C3958 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4208 and Atom C3958. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR3L-1600
Maximum memory size1 TiB256 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4208 and Atom C3958.

PCI Express lanes4816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4208 7.31
+164%
Atom C3958 2.77

Xeon Silver 4208 outperforms Atom C3958 by 164% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Silver 4208 11305
+164%
Atom C3958 4281

Xeon Silver 4208 outperforms Atom C3958 by 164% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.31 2.77
Recency 2 April 2019 15 August 2017
Physical cores 8 16
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 31 Watt

Xeon Silver 4208 has a 163.9% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

Atom C3958, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores, and 174.2% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Silver 4208 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom C3958 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4208 and Atom C3958, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4208
Xeon Silver 4208
Intel Atom C3958
Atom C3958

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 38 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4208 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 6 votes

Rate Atom C3958 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4208 or Atom C3958, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.