Xeon Silver 4210R vs Silver 4116T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4116T
2017
12 cores / 24 threads, 85 Watt
9.92
+0.4%
Xeon Silver 4210R
2020
10 cores / 20 threads, 100 Watt
9.88

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4116T and Xeon Silver 4210R processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking787790
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data28.27
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon SilverIntel Xeon Silver
Power efficiency10.649.01
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date11 July 2017 (7 years ago)24 February 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$511

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4116T and Xeon Silver 4210R basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads2420
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier2124
L1 cache768 KB640 KB
L2 cache12 MB10 MB
L3 cache16.5 MB13.75 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature91 °C84 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4116T and Xeon Silver 4210R compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt100 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4116T and Xeon Silver 4210R. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4116T and Xeon Silver 4210R technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4116T and Xeon Silver 4210R are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4116T and Xeon Silver 4210R. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size768 GB1 TB
Max memory channels66
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/s115.212 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4116T and Xeon Silver 4210R.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4848

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4116T 9.92
+0.4%
Xeon Silver 4210R 9.88

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4116T 15187
+0.5%
Xeon Silver 4210R 15118

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.92 9.88
Recency 11 July 2017 24 February 2020
Physical cores 12 10
Threads 24 20
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 100 Watt

Xeon Silver 4116T has a 0.4% higher aggregate performance score, 20% more physical cores and 20% more threads, and 17.6% lower power consumption.

Xeon Silver 4210R, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon Silver 4116T and Xeon Silver 4210R.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4116T and Xeon Silver 4210R, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4116T
Xeon Silver 4116T
Intel Xeon Silver 4210R
Xeon Silver 4210R

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Silver 4116T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 37 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4210R on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4116T or Xeon Silver 4210R, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.