FX-6300 vs Xeon Silver 4116

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4116
2017
12 cores / 24 threads, 85 Watt
9.27
+257%
FX-6300
2012
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
2.60

Xeon Silver 4116 outperforms FX-6300 by a whopping 257% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4116 and FX-6300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8211714
Place by popularitynot in top-10066
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.530.52
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon Silverno data
Power efficiency10.322.59
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date11 July 2017 (7 years ago)23 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,002$132

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Silver 4116 has 963% better value for money than FX-6300.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4116 and FX-6300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads246
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.8 GHz
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache64K (per core)288 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)6144 KB
L3 cache16.5 MB (shared)8192 KB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data315 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °C71 °C
Number of transistors8,000 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.15 V - Max: 1.3875 V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4116 and FX-6300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4116 and FX-6300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4116 and FX-6300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4116 and FX-6300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4116 and FX-6300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR3-1866
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4116 and FX-6300.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4116 9.27
+257%
FX-6300 2.60

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4116 14723
+256%
FX-6300 4137

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon Silver 4116 868
+90.4%
FX-6300 456

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon Silver 4116 5676
+296%
FX-6300 1432

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.27 2.60
Recency 11 July 2017 23 October 2012
Physical cores 12 6
Threads 24 6
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 95 Watt

Xeon Silver 4116 has a 256.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 11.8% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Silver 4116 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-6300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Silver 4116 is a server/workstation processor while FX-6300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4116 and FX-6300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4116
Xeon Silver 4116
AMD FX-6300
FX-6300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 16 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4116 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4087 votes

Rate FX-6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4116 or FX-6300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.