EPYC 7451 vs Xeon Silver 4116

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4116
2017
12 cores / 24 threads, 85 Watt
9.58
EPYC 7451
2017
24 cores / 48 threads, 180 Watt
16.90
+76.4%

EPYC 7451 outperforms Xeon Silver 4116 by an impressive 76% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4116 and EPYC 7451 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking822403
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.651.78
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon SilverAMD EPYC
Power efficiency10.288.56
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Naples (2017−2018)
Release date11 July 2017 (7 years ago)20 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,002$2,400

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Silver 4116 has 217% better value for money than EPYC 7451.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4116 and EPYC 7451 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads2448
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.3 GHz
Multiplier2123
L1 cache768 KB2.25 MB
L2 cache12 MB12 MB
L3 cache16.5 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data213 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
Number of transistors8,000 million19200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4116 and EPYC 7451 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647TR4
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4116 and EPYC 7451. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4116 and EPYC 7451 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4116 and EPYC 7451 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4116 and EPYC 7451. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size768 GB2 TiB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/s170.671 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4116 and EPYC 7451.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes48128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4116 9.58
EPYC 7451 16.90
+76.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4116 14660
EPYC 7451 25863
+76.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.58 16.90
Physical cores 12 24
Threads 24 48
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 180 Watt

Xeon Silver 4116 has 111.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7451, on the other hand, has a 76.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The EPYC 7451 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4116 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4116 and EPYC 7451, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4116
Xeon Silver 4116
AMD EPYC 7451
EPYC 7451

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 16 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4116 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7451 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4116 or EPYC 7451, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.