Athlon II Neo K125 vs Xeon Silver 4116

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4116 and Athlon II Neo K125 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking822not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.49no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon SilverAMD Athlon II Neo
Power efficiency10.32no data
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Geneva (2010)
Release date11 July 2017 (7 years ago)12 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,002no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4116 and Athlon II Neo K125 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads241
Base clock speed2.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus rateno data2000 MHz
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache16.5 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4116 and Athlon II Neo K125 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647S1
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt12 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4116 and Athlon II Neo K125. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512MMX, 3dDNow!, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
VirusProtect-+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4116 and Athlon II Neo K125 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4116 and Athlon II Neo K125 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4116 and Athlon II Neo K125. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR3
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4116 and Athlon II Neo K125.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4116 14723
+4574%
Athlon II Neo K125 315

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon Silver 4116 868
+372%
Athlon II Neo K125 184

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon Silver 4116 5676
+2985%
Athlon II Neo K125 184

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 July 2017 12 May 2010
Physical cores 12 1
Threads 24 1
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 12 Watt

Xeon Silver 4116 has an age advantage of 7 years, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon II Neo K125, on the other hand, has 608.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon Silver 4116 and Athlon II Neo K125. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon Silver 4116 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon II Neo K125 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4116 and Athlon II Neo K125, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4116
Xeon Silver 4116
AMD Athlon II Neo K125
Athlon II Neo K125

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 16 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4116 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 20 votes

Rate Athlon II Neo K125 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4116 or Athlon II Neo K125, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.