Xeon Gold 6526Y vs Silver 4114

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4114
2017
10 cores / 20 threads, 85 Watt
8.29
Xeon Gold 6526Y
2023
16 cores / 32 threads, 195 Watt
29.08
+251%

Xeon Gold 6526Y outperforms Xeon Silver 4114 by a whopping 251% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4114 and Xeon Gold 6526Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking908154
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.6256.17
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Silverno data
Power efficiency9.1914.05
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Emerald Rapids (2023)
Release date11 July 2017 (7 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$694$1,517

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 6526Y has 748% better value for money than Xeon Silver 4114.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4114 and Xeon Gold 6526Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads2032
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.9 GHz
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache640 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache10 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache13.75 MB37.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data2x 763 mm2
Maximum core temperature78 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data82 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4114 and Xeon Gold 6526Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt195 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4114 and Xeon Gold 6526Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4114 and Xeon Gold 6526Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4114 and Xeon Gold 6526Y are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4114 and Xeon Gold 6526Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR5-5200
Maximum memory size768 GB4 TB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4114 and Xeon Gold 6526Y.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes4880

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4114 8.29
Xeon Gold 6526Y 29.08
+251%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4114 13117
Xeon Gold 6526Y 46025
+251%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.29 29.08
Recency 11 July 2017 14 December 2023
Physical cores 10 16
Threads 20 32
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 195 Watt

Xeon Silver 4114 has 129.4% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6526Y, on the other hand, has a 250.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and 60% more physical cores and 60% more threads.

The Xeon Gold 6526Y is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4114 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4114 and Xeon Gold 6526Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4114
Xeon Silver 4114
Intel Xeon Gold 6526Y
Xeon Gold 6526Y

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 22 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4114 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 12 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6526Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4114 or Xeon Gold 6526Y, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.