VIA Nano U2250 vs Xeon Silver 4114

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4114 and VIA Nano U2250 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking908not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.60no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon SilverVIA Nano
Power efficiency9.20no data
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Isaiah (2009)
Release date11 July 2017 (7 years ago)1 January 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$694no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4114 and VIA Nano U2250 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads201
Base clock speed2.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache640 KBno data
L2 cache10 MB1 MB
L3 cache13.75 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperature78 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4114 and VIA Nano U2250 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647NanoBGA2
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4114 and VIA Nano U2250. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4114 and VIA Nano U2250 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4114 and VIA Nano U2250 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4114 and VIA Nano U2250. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400no data
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4114 and VIA Nano U2250.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4114 13117
+7228%
VIA Nano U2250 179

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 July 2017 1 January 2009
Physical cores 10 1
Threads 20 1
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 10 Watt

Xeon Silver 4114 has an age advantage of 8 years, 900% more physical cores and 1900% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

VIA Nano U2250, on the other hand, has 750% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon Silver 4114 and VIA Nano U2250. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon Silver 4114 is a server/workstation processor while VIA Nano U2250 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4114 and VIA Nano U2250, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4114
Xeon Silver 4114
VIA Nano U2250
Nano U2250

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 22 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4114 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 22 votes

Rate VIA Nano U2250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4114 or VIA Nano U2250, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.