Atom N270 vs Xeon Silver 4114

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4114 and Atom N270 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking901not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.90no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon SilverIntel Atom
Power efficiency9.23no data
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)DiamondVille (2008−2009)
Release date11 July 2017 (7 years ago)2 April 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$694$44

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4114 and Atom N270 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads202
Base clock speed2.2 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz0.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data533.33 MT/s
Multiplier2212
L1 cache640 KB56 KB
L2 cache10 MB512 KB
L3 cache13.75 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data25.9638 mm2
Maximum core temperature78 °C90 °C
Number of transistorsno data47 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+-
VID voltage rangeno data0.9V-1.1625V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4114 and Atom N270 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647PBGA437
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt2.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4114 and Atom N270. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE, Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data-
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4114 and Atom N270 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4114 and Atom N270 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4114 and Atom N270. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400no data
Maximum memory size768 GB8 GB
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4114 and Atom N270.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4114 13161
+9577%
Atom N270 136

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 July 2017 2 April 2008
Physical cores 10 1
Threads 20 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 2 Watt

Xeon Silver 4114 has an age advantage of 9 years, 900% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Atom N270, on the other hand, has 4150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon Silver 4114 and Atom N270. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon Silver 4114 is a server/workstation processor while Atom N270 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4114 and Atom N270, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4114
Xeon Silver 4114
Intel Atom N270
Atom N270

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 22 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4114 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 225 votes

Rate Atom N270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4114 or Atom N270, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.