Xeon W-2104 vs Silver 4110

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4110
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 85 Watt
6.43
+85.8%
Xeon W-2104
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 120 Watt
3.46

Xeon Silver 4110 outperforms Xeon W-2104 by an impressive 86% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4110 and Xeon W-2104 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10491539
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.135.38
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon SilverIntel Xeon W
Power efficiency7.162.73
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
Release date11 July 2017 (7 years ago)29 August 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$501$255

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Silver 4110 has 14% better value for money than Xeon W-2104.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4110 and Xeon W-2104 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier2132
L1 cache512 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache8 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache11 MB8.25 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data484 mm2
Maximum core temperature77 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data66 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4110 and Xeon W-2104 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA2066
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4110 and Xeon W-2104. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data46 Bit
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4110 and Xeon W-2104 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4110 and Xeon W-2104 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4110 and Xeon W-2104. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size768 GB512 GB
Max memory channels64
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/s76.805 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4110 and Xeon W-2104.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4848

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4110 6.43
+85.8%
Xeon W-2104 3.46

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4110 10220
+86%
Xeon W-2104 5495

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.43 3.46
Recency 11 July 2017 29 August 2017
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 4
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 120 Watt

Xeon Silver 4110 has a 85.8% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and 41.2% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-2104, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 month.

The Xeon Silver 4110 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-2104 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4110 and Xeon W-2104, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4110
Xeon Silver 4110
Intel Xeon W-2104
Xeon W-2104

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 18 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Xeon W-2104 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4110 or Xeon W-2104, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.