Pentium M 765 vs Xeon Silver 4110

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4110
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 85 Watt
6.44
+2827%
Pentium M 765
2004
1 core / 1 thread, 7 Watt
0.22

Xeon Silver 4110 outperforms Pentium M 765 by a whopping 2827% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4110 and Pentium M 765 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10593195
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.82no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon SilverPentium M
Power efficiency7.170.99
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release date11 July 2017 (7 years ago)20 October 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$501no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4110 and Pentium M 765 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads161
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.1 GHz
Bus rateno data400 MHz
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache512 KB32 KB
L2 cache8 MB2 MB
L3 cache11 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm90 nm
Die sizeno data87 mm2
Maximum core temperature77 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data144 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+-
VID voltage rangeno data0.988-1.356V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4110 and Pentium M 765 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647PPGA478, H-PBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4110 and Pentium M 765. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4110 and Pentium M 765 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4110 and Pentium M 765 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4110 and Pentium M 765. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR2
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4110 and Pentium M 765.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.44 0.22
Recency 11 July 2017 20 October 2004
Physical cores 8 1
Threads 16 1
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 7 Watt

Xeon Silver 4110 has a 2827.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

Pentium M 765, on the other hand, has 1114.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Silver 4110 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium M 765 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Silver 4110 is a server/workstation processor while Pentium M 765 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4110 and Pentium M 765, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4110
Xeon Silver 4110
Intel Pentium M 765
Pentium M 765

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 19 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 7 votes

Rate Pentium M 765 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4110 or Pentium M 765, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.