EPYC 7251 vs Xeon Silver 4110

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4110
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 85 Watt
6.44
EPYC 7251
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 120 Watt
9.40
+46%

EPYC 7251 outperforms Xeon Silver 4110 by a considerable 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4110 and EPYC 7251 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1059813
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.862.86
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon SilverAMD EPYC
Power efficiency7.177.41
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Naples (2017−2018)
Release date11 July 2017 (7 years ago)29 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$501$574

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Silver 4110 has 105% better value for money than EPYC 7251.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4110 and EPYC 7251 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.9 GHz
Multiplier2121
L1 cache512 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache8 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache11 MB32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Maximum core temperature77 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4110 and EPYC 7251 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647TR4
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4110 and EPYC 7251. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4110 and EPYC 7251 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4110 and EPYC 7251 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4110 and EPYC 7251. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size768 GB2 TiB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/s153.652 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4110 and EPYC 7251.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes48128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4110 6.44
EPYC 7251 9.40
+46%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4110 10226
EPYC 7251 14935
+46%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.44 9.40
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 120 Watt

Xeon Silver 4110 has 41.2% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7251, on the other hand, has a 46% higher aggregate performance score.

The EPYC 7251 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4110 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4110 and EPYC 7251, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4110
Xeon Silver 4110
AMD EPYC 7251
EPYC 7251

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 19 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.2 121 vote

Rate EPYC 7251 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4110 or EPYC 7251, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.