i3-6100E vs Xeon Silver 4110

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4110
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 85 Watt
6.44
+208%
Core i3-6100E
2015
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.09

Xeon Silver 4110 outperforms Core i3-6100E by a whopping 208% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4110 and Core i3-6100E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10591892
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.820.24
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon SilverIntel Core i3
Power efficiency7.175.65
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date11 July 2017 (7 years ago)12 October 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$501$225

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Silver 4110 has 2325% better value for money than i3-6100E.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4110 and Core i3-6100E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads164
Base clock speed2.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.7 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier2127
L1 cache512 KB128 KB
L2 cache8 MB512 KB
L3 cache11 MB3 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data98.57 mm2
Maximum core temperature77 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1750 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4110 and Core i3-6100E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647no data
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4110 and Core i3-6100E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4110 and Core i3-6100E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4110 and Core i3-6100E are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4110 and Core i3-6100E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400LPDDR3-1866
Maximum memory size768 GB64 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/s34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 530

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4110 and Core i3-6100E.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4110 6.44
+208%
i3-6100E 2.09

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4110 10226
+208%
i3-6100E 3315

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.44 2.09
Recency 11 July 2017 12 October 2015
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 4
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon Silver 4110 has a 208.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

i3-6100E, on the other hand, has 142.9% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Silver 4110 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-6100E in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Silver 4110 is a server/workstation processor while Core i3-6100E is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4110 and Core i3-6100E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4110
Xeon Silver 4110
Intel Core i3-6100E
Core i3-6100E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 19 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i3-6100E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4110 or Core i3-6100E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.