Celeron J4005 vs Xeon Silver 4108

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4108
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 85 Watt
5.72
+472%
Celeron J4005
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
1.00

Xeon Silver 4108 outperforms Celeron J4005 by a whopping 472% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4108 and Celeron J4005 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11382473
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.981.01
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon SilverIntel Celeron
Power efficiency6.259.29
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Goldmont Plus (2017)
Release date11 July 2017 (7 years ago)11 December 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$417$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Silver 4108 has 492% better value for money than Celeron J4005.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4108 and Celeron J4005 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed1.8 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.7 GHz
Multiplier1820
L1 cache512 KB112 KB
L2 cache8 MB4 MB (shared)
L3 cache11 MB4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data93 mm2
Maximum core temperature77 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4108 and Celeron J4005 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647FCBGA1090
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4108 and Celeron J4005. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+-
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4108 and Celeron J4005 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4108 and Celeron J4005 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4108 and Celeron J4005. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4
Maximum memory size768 GB8 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 600
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data700 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon Silver 4108 and Celeron J4005 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon Silver 4108 and Celeron J4005 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon Silver 4108 and Celeron J4005 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4108 and Celeron J4005.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes486
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4108 5.72
+472%
Celeron J4005 1.00

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4108 8909
+474%
Celeron J4005 1553

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon Silver 4108 826
+140%
Celeron J4005 344

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon Silver 4108 4391
+658%
Celeron J4005 579

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.72 1.00
Recency 11 July 2017 11 December 2017
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 2
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 10 Watt

Xeon Silver 4108 has a 472% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

Celeron J4005, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, and 750% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Silver 4108 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4005 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Silver 4108 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron J4005 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4108 and Celeron J4005, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4108
Xeon Silver 4108
Intel Celeron J4005
Celeron J4005

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 16 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4108 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 163 votes

Rate Celeron J4005 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4108 or Celeron J4005, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.