EPYC 7252 vs Xeon Platinum 9282

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 9282 and EPYC 7252 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated626
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data10.65
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon PlatinumAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data9.64
Architecture codenameCascade Lake-AP (2019)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$475

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 9282 and EPYC 7252 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores56 (Hexapentaconta-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads11216
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier2631
L1 cache64K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache77 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Number of transistors8,000 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 9282 and EPYC 7252 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration82 (Multiprocessor)
SocketIntel BGA5903TR4
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 9282 and EPYC 7252. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
SIPP+-
Precision Boost 2++

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 9282 and EPYC 7252 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 9282 and EPYC 7252 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 9282 and EPYC 7252. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size2 TiB4 TiB
Max memory channels128
Maximum memory bandwidth281.6 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 April 2019 7 August 2019
Physical cores 56 8
Threads 112 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 120 Watt

Xeon Platinum 9282 has 600% more physical cores and 600% more threads.

EPYC 7252, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon Platinum 9282 and EPYC 7252. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 9282 and EPYC 7252, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 9282
Xeon Platinum 9282
AMD EPYC 7252
EPYC 7252

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 376 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 9282 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 28 votes

Rate EPYC 7252 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 9282 or EPYC 7252, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.