i3-9000T vs Xeon Platinum 9282
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Platinum 9282 and Core i3-9000T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
Series | Intel Xeon Platinum | Intel Core i3 |
Architecture codename | Cascade Lake-AP (2019) | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) |
Release date | 2 April 2019 (5 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon Platinum 9282 and Core i3-9000T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 56 (Hexapentaconta-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 112 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 2.6 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 3.0 | DMI 3.0 |
Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | 4 × 8 GT/s |
Multiplier | 26 | 32 |
L1 cache | 3.5 MB | 256 KB |
L2 cache | 56 MB | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 77 MB (shared) | 6 MB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | no data | 126 mm2 |
Number of transistors | 8,000 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Platinum 9282 and Core i3-9000T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 8 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
Socket | Intel BGA5903 | LGA-1151 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 9282 and Core i3-9000T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | + | - |
AVX | + | + |
PowerNow | + | - |
vPro | + | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Speed Shift | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
TSX | + | - |
SIPP | + | - |
Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon Platinum 9282 and Core i3-9000T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 9282 and Core i3-9000T are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 9282 and Core i3-9000T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2400 |
Maximum memory size | 2 TiB | 64 GB |
Max memory channels | 12 | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 281.6 GB/s | 38.397 GB/s |
ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 56 | 4 |
Threads | 112 | 4 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | 35 Watt |
Xeon Platinum 9282 has 1300% more physical cores and 2700% more threads.
i3-9000T, on the other hand, has 1042.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon Platinum 9282 and Core i3-9000T. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon Platinum 9282 is a server/workstation processor while Core i3-9000T is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 9282 and Core i3-9000T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.