Xeon Gold 6328H vs Platinum 9221
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Platinum 9221 and Xeon Gold 6328H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Server |
Series | Intel Xeon Platinum | no data |
Architecture codename | Cascade Lake-AP (2019) | Cooper Lake-SP (2021) |
Release date | 2 April 2019 (5 years ago) | 6 April 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon Platinum 9221 and Xeon Gold 6328H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
Threads | 64 | 32 |
Base clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 21 | no data |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 71.5 MB (shared) | 22 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Number of transistors | 8,000 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Platinum 9221 and Xeon Gold 6328H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 8 | 4 |
Socket | Intel BGA5903 | FCLGA4189 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 165 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 9221 and Xeon Gold 6328H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX-512 | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
vPro | + | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Speed Shift | + | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
TSX | + | + |
Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Xeon Platinum 9221 and Xeon Gold 6328H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | + |
EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 9221 and Xeon Gold 6328H are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 9221 and Xeon Gold 6328H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR4 RDIMM |
Maximum memory size | 2 TiB | 1.12 TB |
Max memory channels | 12 | 6 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 281.6 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 9221 and Xeon Gold 6328H.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 48 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 2 April 2019 | 6 April 2021 |
Physical cores | 32 | 16 |
Threads | 64 | 32 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 165 Watt |
Xeon Platinum 9221 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Xeon Gold 6328H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 51.5% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon Platinum 9221 and Xeon Gold 6328H. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 9221 and Xeon Gold 6328H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.