Atom x7211RE vs Xeon Platinum 8592+
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Platinum 8592+ and Atom x7211RE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 26 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.73 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 14.29 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Emerald Rapids (2023) | Amston Lake (2024) |
| Release date | 14 December 2023 (1 year ago) | 8 April 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $11,600 | $42 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon Platinum 8592+ and Atom x7211RE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 128 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 320 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 2x 763 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 81 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Platinum 8592+ and Atom x7211RE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | 4677 | Intel BGA 1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8592+ and Atom x7211RE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon Platinum 8592+ and Atom x7211RE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8592+ and Atom x7211RE are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8592+ and Atom x7211RE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Intel UHD Graphics 16EU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8592+ and Atom x7211RE.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 80 | 9 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 14 December 2023 | 8 April 2024 |
| Physical cores | 64 | 2 |
| Threads | 128 | 2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 6 Watt |
Xeon Platinum 8592+ has 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads.
Atom x7211RE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, and 5733.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon Platinum 8592+ and Atom x7211RE. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8592+ is a server/workstation processor while Atom x7211RE is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8592+ and Atom x7211RE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
