EPYC 9965 vs Xeon Platinum 8571N

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8571N and EPYC 9965 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking53not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.42no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency13.58no data
Architecture codenameEmerald Rapids (2023)Turin (2024)
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,839$14,813

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8571N and EPYC 9965 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores52192
Threads104384
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.25 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache300 MB (shared)384 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm3 nm
Die size2x 763 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)78 °Cno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8571N and EPYC 9965 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA4677SP5
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt500 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8571N and EPYC 9965. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8571N and EPYC 9965 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8571N and EPYC 9965 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8571N and EPYC 9965. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5 @ 4800 MT/s (1 DPC)DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8571N and EPYC 9965.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes80128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 December 2023 10 October 2024
Physical cores 52 192
Threads 104 384
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 500 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8571N has 66.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9965, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, and 269.2% more physical cores and 269.2% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Xeon Platinum 8571N and EPYC 9965. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8571N and EPYC 9965, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8571N
Xeon Platinum 8571N
AMD EPYC 9965
EPYC 9965

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Xeon Platinum 8571N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 31 vote

Rate EPYC 9965 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8571N or EPYC 9965, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.