Xeon Silver 4510 vs Platinum 8454H

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8454H
2023
32 cores / 64 threads, 270 Watt
39.25
+82.5%
Xeon Silver 4510
2023
12 cores / 24 threads, 150 Watt
21.51

Xeon Platinum 8454H outperforms Xeon Silver 4510 by an impressive 82% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8454H and Xeon Silver 4510 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking70252
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.42100.00
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency13.7613.57
Architecture codenameSapphire Rapids (2023−2024)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date10 January 2023 (1 year ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,540$563

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Silver 4510 has 860% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8454H.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8454H and Xeon Silver 4510 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads6424
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache82.5 MB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size4x 477 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °C84 °C
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8454H and Xeon Silver 4510 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration82
SocketFCLGA4677FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)270 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8454H and Xeon Silver 4510. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8454H and Xeon Silver 4510 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXYes with Intel® SPSYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8454H and Xeon Silver 4510 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8454H and Xeon Silver 4510. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800, DDR5-4400DDR5 @ 4400 MT/s (1 DPC &2DPC)
Maximum memory size4 TB4 TB
Max memory channels88
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8454H and Xeon Silver 4510.

PCIe version5.05
PCI Express lanes8080

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8454H 39.25
+82.5%
Xeon Silver 4510 21.51

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8454H 62347
+82.5%
Xeon Silver 4510 34170

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 39.25 21.51
Recency 10 January 2023 14 December 2023
Physical cores 32 12
Threads 64 24
Power consumption (TDP) 270 Watt 150 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8454H has a 82.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.

Xeon Silver 4510, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and 80% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Platinum 8454H is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4510 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8454H and Xeon Silver 4510, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8454H
Xeon Platinum 8454H
Intel Xeon Silver 4510
Xeon Silver 4510

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8454H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Silver 4510 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8454H or Xeon Silver 4510, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.