Xeon Gold 6122 vs Platinum 8368Q

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8368Q
2021
38 cores / 76 threads, 270 Watt
29.50
+96.3%
Xeon Gold 6122
2018
20 cores / 40 threads, 120 Watt
15.03

Xeon Platinum 8368Q outperforms Xeon Gold 6122 by an impressive 96% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Xeon Gold 6122 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking147469
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency10.3011.80
Architecture codenameIce Lake-SP (2021)no data
Release date6 April 2021 (3 years ago)1 April 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Xeon Gold 6122 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores3820 (Icosa-Core)
Threads7640
Base clock speed2.6 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache57 MB (shared)28 MB
Chip lithography10 nm14 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)85 °Cno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Xeon Gold 6122 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA4189FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)270 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Xeon Gold 6122. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Xeon Gold 6122 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Xeon Gold 6122 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Xeon Gold 6122. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size6 TB768 GB
Max memory channels86
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Xeon Gold 6122.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanes6448

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8368Q 29.50
+96.3%
Xeon Gold 6122 15.03

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8368Q 46681
+96.3%
Xeon Gold 6122 23781

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.50 15.03
Recency 6 April 2021 1 April 2018
Physical cores 38 20
Threads 76 40
Chip lithography 10 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 270 Watt 120 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8368Q has a 96.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 90% more physical cores and 90% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon Gold 6122, on the other hand, has 125% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Platinum 8368Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6122 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Xeon Gold 6122, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Intel Xeon Gold 6122
Xeon Gold 6122

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 4 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8368Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon Gold 6122 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8368Q or Xeon Gold 6122, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.