Celeron G6900TE vs Xeon Platinum 8368Q

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8368Q
2021
38 cores / 76 threads, 270 Watt
29.39
+1872%
Celeron G6900TE
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.49

Xeon Platinum 8368Q outperforms Celeron G6900TE by a whopping 1872% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Celeron G6900TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1472144
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency10.304.03
Architecture codenameIce Lake-SP (2021)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date6 April 2021 (3 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Celeron G6900TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores382 (Dual-core)
Threads762
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache57 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm10 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)85 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Celeron G6900TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA41891700
Power consumption (TDP)270 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Celeron G6900TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Celeron G6900TE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Celeron G6900TE are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Celeron G6900TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size6 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 710

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Celeron G6900TE.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes64no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8368Q 29.39
+1872%
Celeron G6900TE 1.49

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8368Q 46681
+1867%
Celeron G6900TE 2373

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.39 1.49
Recency 6 April 2021 4 January 2022
Physical cores 38 2
Threads 76 2
Power consumption (TDP) 270 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8368Q has a 1872.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 1800% more physical cores and 3700% more threads.

Celeron G6900TE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, and 671.4% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Platinum 8368Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G6900TE in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8368Q is a server/workstation processor while Celeron G6900TE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Celeron G6900TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Intel Celeron G6900TE
Celeron G6900TE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 4 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8368Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 9 votes

Rate Celeron G6900TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8368Q or Celeron G6900TE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.