Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) vs Xeon Platinum 8368Q

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8368Q
2021
38 cores / 76 threads, 270 Watt
29.39
+8.2%
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
2024
14 cores / 14 threads, 40 Watt
27.17

Xeon Platinum 8368Q outperforms Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking147180
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataApple M4
Power efficiency10.2563.95
Architecture codenameIce Lake-SP (2021)no data
Release date6 April 2021 (3 years ago)30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores3814 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads7614
Base clock speed2.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache57 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography10 nm3 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)85 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA4189no data
Power consumption (TDP)270 Watt40 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Apple M4 Pro (14 cores). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Apple M4 Pro (14 cores). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200no data
Maximum memory size6 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M4 20-core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Apple M4 Pro (14 cores).

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes64no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.39 27.17
Recency 6 April 2021 30 October 2024
Physical cores 38 14
Threads 76 14
Chip lithography 10 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 270 Watt 40 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8368Q has a 8.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 171.4% more physical cores and 442.9% more threads.

Apple M4 Pro (14 cores), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 575% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Apple M4 Pro (14 cores).

Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8368Q is a server/workstation processor while Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Apple M4 Pro (14 cores), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
M4 Pro (14 cores)

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 4 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8368Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8368Q or Apple M4 Pro (14 cores), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.