Ryzen 9 7940HX vs Xeon Platinum 8368

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8368
2021
38 cores / 76 threads, 270 Watt
60.15
+71.4%

Xeon Platinum 8368 outperforms Ryzen 9 7940HX by an impressive 71% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8368 and Ryzen 9 7940HX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19112
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045)
Power efficiency20.3158.18
Architecture codenameIce Lake-SP (2021)Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
Release date6 April 2021 (3 years ago)17 January 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8368 and Ryzen 9 7940HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores3816 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads7632
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz5.2 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)1 MB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)16 MB
L3 cache57 MB (shared)64 MB
Chip lithography10 nm5 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)83 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data9900 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8368 and Ryzen 9 7940HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA4189FL1
Power consumption (TDP)270 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8368 and Ryzen 9 7940HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8368 and Ryzen 9 7940HX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8368 and Ryzen 9 7940HX are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8368 and Ryzen 9 7940HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size6 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 610M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8368 and Ryzen 9 7940HX.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes64no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8368 60.15
+71.4%
Ryzen 9 7940HX 35.09

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8368 92054
+71.4%
Ryzen 9 7940HX 53696

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 60.15 35.09
Recency 6 April 2021 17 January 2024
Physical cores 38 16
Threads 76 32
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 270 Watt 55 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8368 has a 71.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 137.5% more physical cores and 137.5% more threads.

Ryzen 9 7940HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 390.9% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Platinum 8368 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 7940HX in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8368 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 7940HX is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8368 and Ryzen 9 7940HX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8368
Xeon Platinum 8368
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX
Ryzen 9 7940HX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 98 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8368 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 40 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 7940HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8368 or Ryzen 9 7940HX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.