Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8352Y
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 205 Watt
43.21
+120%
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 54 Watt
19.68

Xeon Platinum 8352Y outperforms Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 by a whopping 120% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8352Y and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking51291
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)
Power efficiency19.9534.49
Architecture codenameno dataStrix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024)
Release date1 April 2021 (3 years ago)25 July 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8352Y and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads6424
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz5.1 GHz
L2 cacheno data12 MB
L3 cache48 MB24 MB
Chip lithography10 nm4 nm
Maximum core temperature81 °C100 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8352Y and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFCLGA4189FP8
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt54 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8352Y and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (55 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8352Y and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8352Y and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8352Y and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size6 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8352Y and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes64no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8352Y 43.21
+120%
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 19.68

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8352Y 68643
+120%
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 31255

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 43.21 19.68
Recency 1 April 2021 25 July 2024
Physical cores 32 12
Threads 64 24
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 54 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8352Y has a 119.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 279.6% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Platinum 8352Y is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8352Y is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8352Y and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8352Y
Xeon Platinum 8352Y
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 5 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8352Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 6 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8352Y or Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.